CHAN Author
Biography not available.
Browse all ART CRITICISM books
Browse all Ashworth books
Browse all FOLKLORE books
Browse all GARDENS books
Browse all GRAPHIC NOVELS books
Browse all Hamilton books
Browse all HISTORY - MEDIEVAL books
Browse all HUMOUR books
Browse all KINDRED books
Browse all LITERARY STUDIES books
Browse all LONDON books
Browse all Lozada books
Browse all Medical : Nursing - Mental Health books
Browse all MIND books
Browse all MUSEOLOGY books
Browse all NON-CLASSIFIABLE books
Browse all NONLINEAR SCIENCE books
Browse all Ormonde books
Browse all POPULAR SCIENCE books
Browse all RELIGIOUS STUDIES books
Browse all SPIRIT books
Browse all SPORT books
Browse all TRAVEL WRITING books
Out of Stock
Paperback · ISBN 9780197580301
Inclusive of GST and other taxes
Arriving at your doorstep in 10-15 days
Our logisitcs team will make sure everyitem is delivered safely
| ISBN | 9780197580301 |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Academic |
| Publication date | October 2021 |
| Language | English |
| MRP | £26.99 GBP |
| Page count | 232 |
| Item weight | 73 g |
What motivates states to act the way they do? Contesting Revisionism focuses on a particular kind of motivation inclining a state to challenge the existing norms, rules, and institutions of international order: revisionism. The authors offer a critique of the existing discourse on revisionism and investigate the origin and evolution of the foreign policy orientations of revisionist states in the past. Furthermore, they introduce an ensemble of indicators to discern and compare the extent of revisionist tendencies on the part of contemporary China and the United States. Questioning the facile assumption that past episodes will repeat in the future, they argue that "hard" revisionism relying on war and conquest is less viable and likely in today's world. Instead, "soft" revisionism seeking to promote institutional change is more relevant and likely. Focusing on contemporary Sino-American relations, they conclude that much of the current discourse based on power transition theory is problematic. A dominant power is not inevitably committed to the defense of international order, nor does a rising power always have a revisionist agenda to challenge this order. The transformation of international order does not necessarily require a power transition between China and the US., nor does a possible power transition necessarily augur war. After developing the concept of revisionism both theoretically and empirically, they conclude with a series of policy recommendations for enhancing international stability and diminishing tension in Sino-American relations.
Log in to write a review for this book.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your opinion.
Biography not available.