McKenna, Michael Author
Biography not available.
Browse all ART CRITICISM books
Browse all Ashworth books
Browse all FOLKLORE books
Browse all GARDENS books
Browse all GRAPHIC NOVELS books
Browse all Hamilton books
Browse all HISTORY - MEDIEVAL books
Browse all HUMOUR books
Browse all KINDRED books
Browse all LITERARY STUDIES books
Browse all LONDON books
Browse all Lozada books
Browse all Medical : Nursing - Mental Health books
Browse all MIND books
Browse all MUSEOLOGY books
Browse all NON-CLASSIFIABLE books
Browse all NONLINEAR SCIENCE books
Browse all Ormonde books
Browse all POPULAR SCIENCE books
Browse all RELIGIOUS STUDIES books
Browse all SPIRIT books
Browse all SPORT books
Browse all TRAVEL WRITING books
Out of Stock
CONVERSATION & RESPONSIBILITY
Hardback Β· ISBN 9780199740031
Inclusive of GST and other taxes
Arriving at your doorstep in 10-15 days
Our logisitcs team will make sure everyitem is delivered safely
| ISBN | 9780199740031 |
|---|---|
| Subtitle | CONVERSATION & RESPONSIBILITY |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Publication date | March 2012 |
| Language | English |
| MRP | Β£120.00 GBP |
| Page count | 272 |
| Item weight | 132 g |
The conversational theory of moral responsibility that McKenna develops here accepts two features of Strawson's theory: that moral responsibility is essentially interpersonal--so that being responsible must be understood by reference to the nature of holding responsible--and that the moral emotions are central to holding responsible. While upholding these two aspects of Strawson's theory, McKenna's theory rejects a further Strawsonian thesis, which is that holding morally responsible is more fundamental or basic than being morally responsible. On the conversational theory, the conditions for holding responsible are dependent on the nature of the agent who is responsible. So holding responsible cannot be more basic than being responsible. Nevertheless, the nature of the agent who is morally responsible is to be understood in terms of sensitivity to those who would make moral demands of her, thereby holding her responsible. Being responsible is therefore also dependent on holding responsible. Thus, neither being nor holding morally responsible is more basic than the other. They are mutually dependent.
Log in to write a review for this book.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your opinion.
Biography not available.